Filter by category
Publications
2010 – Parisaei et al.
Parisaei et al. Acceptability of the fetal electrocardiographic (STAN) monitoring system by staff at a high risk maternity unit. J Perinat Med. 2010 Mar;38(2):187-90.
Download publication2010 – Chandraharan
Chandraharan STAN: An introduction to its use, limitations and caveats. ObsGyn Midwifery Prod News 2010.
Download publication2010 – Amer-Wåhlin and Miller
Amer-Wåhlin and Miller ST Analysis as an adjunct to Electronic Fetal Monitoring. J Perinat Neonat Nurs. 2010;24(3): 231–7.
Download publication2010 – Westerhuis et al.
Westerhuis et al. Cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram compared with cardiotocography only for intrapartum monitoring. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(6): 1173-80.
Download publication2010 – Rzepka et al.
Rzepka et al. Clinical Outcomes of High-risk Labours Monitored Using Fetal Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2010;39:27-32.
Download publication2010 – Ragupathy et al.
Ragupathy et al. The use of STAN monitoring in the labour ward. Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;30(5): 465-9.
Download publication2010 – Norén and Carlsson
Norén and Carlsson Reduced prevalence of metabolic acidosis at birth: an analysis of established STAN usage in the total population of deliveries in a Swedish district hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:546.e1-7.
Download publication2009- Vayssièr et al.
Vayssièr et al. Inter-observer agreement in clinical decision-making for abnormal cardiotocogram (CTG) during labour: a comparison between CTG and CTG plus STAN. BJOG.
Download publication2009 – Costa et al.
Costa et al. Prediction of neonatal acidemia by computer analysis of fetal heart rate and ST event signals. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:464.e1-6.
Download publication